Civil War In America In 2010??

The banking system is on the verge of collapse. We are trillions in debt. People in this country don't want national health care, car company bailouts, high taxes, and a lower dollar. No one in Washington is listening. The next logical step is to escalate things until they get the message.

According to this article, O-bomb-a is preparing as if Civil War was going to break out, here in the US, sometime soon.

Doing a few seconds of research I was able to pull up the Wikipedia page on the military branch mentioned in that article, USNORTHCOM.

From the Wikipedia link:

"The Military Commissions Act of 2006 lifted many restrictions placed on the military to support civilian administration by the Posse Comitatus Act, however the US Supreme Court ruled in June 2008 that significant portions of the MCA were unconstitutional. The "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" H.R. 5122 (2006) effectively nullified the limits of the Insurrection Act [2] when it was passed; however, the bill was amended in 2008."

(emphasis mine)

Just goes to show what a joke the Constitution is and how it is so easily ignored when it becomes convenient for the thugs in DC to do so. Also, it might be time to start stocking up on guns and ammo! Maybe it's too late!

Bookmark This And Remember It On April 15

Doing a quick Google search and some reading has led me to the conclusion that there IS NO LAW ON THE BOOKS REQUIRING ANY AMERICAN TO PAY INCOME TAX!!! Congress is authorized to pass such a law but has not as of yet passed it. Therefore, Irwin Schiff is being jailed illegally! Check out his site!

http://www.paynoincometax.com/

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070802180120AAtEvrX

Also this video is great

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2208477968446177859#

Remember This The Next Time You Vote

Anytime you cast a ballot, you are, by proxy at least, authorizing someone in your hometown, state, or in DC to STEAL MONEY FROM OTHERS ON YOUR BEHALF, and then distribute it as they (or you) see fit. Don't forget that each and every politician will skim a generous sum for themselves and their friends as well. Do you really want that on your conscience?

It's A Very Fine Line Indeed

The line I'm talking about separates anarcho-capitalists from everyone else. Up until about a year, maybe 16 months ago, I was squarely on the evil, horrible side of that line.

You see, I was never a liberal. I started off as a Conservative who thought I was getting limited government (ala Reagan, or so I was told) but instead got massive wars and increased spending. Then I sort of abandoned politics altogether and gave up. Then I got back into it again and found the FairTax book and thought it was the best idea ever. Boy was I stupid. But those are the sort of tricks both Republicans and Democrats will try on you to win your support. And it worked on me, until I discovered Murray Rothbard, Ron Paul, Ludwig von Mises, Lew Rockwell, Jeffrey Tucker, and so many others, living and deceased. These brave men (and some women as well) have guided me and I have firmly REJECTED GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AND TAXATION as immoral, misguided, and, criminal.

Things like the FairTax blur the line between good (anarcho-capitalists) and evil (everyone else). But the line exists, and it feels damn good to be on the right side and be fighting for what is right and just. The hard part is trying to guide others, because without support these ideas will wither and fade away. We must not let the work of Ron Paul, Murray Rothbard, and many others go to waste. We must be prepared to fight the battle and struggle against government oppression, lest we become mere slaves to the criminals in DC and elsewhere. If there's anything worth fighting for, it's not universal health care or big business bailouts, but liberty. Anything short of 100% freedom and liberty is unacceptable and should be rejected by rational men and women. We are in this mess not because of people such as Rothbard, Paul, and Rockwell, but because of men named Washington, Lincoln, Bush, and Obama. Small government is just as bad as big government, if not worse. Small government lures people in to the lie that some government intervention is OK, and that we can just leave things like national defense or currency to the leaders in Washington. At least with big government many more people see what a scam it all is. Either way, government must be roundly rejected on the grounds of theft. Theft of property, liberty, time, and money.

There are many excellent resources for anyone who is new to the world of anarcho-capitalism, or AC for short. LewRockwell.com and Mises.org are excellent starting points. They will lead to other interesting finds via the links and archives they provide. There are also some good forums for political discussion such as the one at TwoPlusTwo.com.

"We Own AIG"

I have heard this quote, or very close variations on it, often. It also extends to GM and other bailed out institutions. Of course it's a huge fallacy to claim that "we" own anything as taxpayers. If "we" actually owned it, "we" could sell it at any time. And that can't happen. Any time someone claims they are "paying back TARP money to the taxpayers" I want to stand up and ask where the hell my check is. Of course no check is coming, and if it did, it might very well bounce.

Criminal Obama's Speech

Last night was the big announcement concerning the additional troops that are "necessary" to "win" the war in Afghanistan. What a joke.

This whole "war on terror" makes no sense to any rational observer. First, you can't go to war with terror. Terror is like drugs, guns, rape, theft, or loaves of bread in the sense that they will always exist, at least in our lifetimes. You can't "win" a war on rape or drugs or guns by attacking innocent people. The only way to properly allocate drugs, guns, theft, rape, etc is to allow the free market to dictate the proper price and hence quantity of each, according to what each person will pay. No, this doesn't mean if you have enough money you can rape and steal as you please, but it will more efficiently punish and deter crimes such as those. It's the same with terror.

Anyone who wants to practice terror (and I'm talking real, harmful stuff here like killing innocents, and not making a wisecrack in the line at the airport) would be subject to the laws and penalties of the court system in a free market. Those penalties would likely be very high, and unlike our current system of torture or permanent lockup, they would be paid directly to the victim(s).

The lack of private property rights also plays a huge role in this "war on terror" along with our occupation in Iraq. "We were attacked" was the common rallying point after 9/11/01. However, I was not attacked. I do not feel threatened by Afghanistan, Iraq, al Qaeda, the Taliban (or Tolly Bon as Barack calls them) or really any other foreigners. I wish to opt out of any "protection" from these made up threats to me.

However, I do feel that the real victims of 9/11 should be free to pursue justice and receive compensation for their losses. They have a legitimate reason for attack and if the 9/11 hijackers and/or plotters/enablers can be found they should be prosecuted. The only problem is, the US (Criminal) Government is probably the biggest culprit in 9/11. The FAA did nothing to stop the attacks, and Federal law prohibited passengers from being able to defend themselves with guns, knives, or other weapons of their own. So you know real justice will never be handed down, at least as long as the criminals in DC have their way.